Morning, back to it. Apologies about yesterday, I got stuck in town doing shite and wasn’t back until late.
We can start here as it looks like this is where we’re heading, and that’s both good and bad. As I’ve said many times, I don’t think you stop this future, the technology we’re building is massively hamstrung by not doing the above and eventually it’ll happen - that’s not to say it lasts, but we’re 100% going to try this method of running the Western World. There’s a group of people who answer in variations of why it’s not possible or could never happen, which is a pointless way of looking at things, because previously ‘impossible’ things have happened many times. That line of thought is just camouflage for saying ‘too hard’ or ‘that’s too scary, I don’t like it’. It is scary, it could change many things about your life and the way the World works, but if this tide is all but inevitable, you better learn to swim. The data itself is perhaps the biggest issue, because if you’re trying to create a ground truth then you need ALL of it or that missing data point could give you a false reading, it must also be accurate. What that means for you personally is probably massive intrusion into your personal life. So your finances, spending habits, what you eat, where you go, what you watch, who you’re with, what you say, your health records, your educational performance, your employment history, your ethnicity and DNA background, what you read and watch - sounds crazy doesn’t it? But the reality is the bulk of that data is already available and you probably gave it freely, or in an unwittingly blasé way in order to partake in a product or activity that you find useful. So if we imagine that all of this data from everyone in the nation is fed into a system to be interrogated, you then have an ultra dashboard that shows the closest thing to reality you’re going to get data wise. All of this data could be anonymised so that you’re just a number and the system has no way of finding out who the number refers to, this kind of technology is already used for anonymous Cryptocurrency transactions using variations of ZK (Zero Knowledge) Proofs. So everything that needs to be known for the system to ensure ‘truth’ for function is available, but not the identity of the parties involved. Now you have that data you can start to pull levers to try and get the outcomes you want, the world’s biggest game of Civilisation. This is the world that both the Blair types and the Musk types want, but to enable different outcomes, or perhaps sold in different ways. This is one of the reasons it’s inevitable, all the power factions vying for dominance in the West want this implemented. To allow the state to use this system there must be trust that the data is ‘true’ and is being interpreted without bias - not easy, the closest thing to impossible about the whole affair. So you can see that our current wholesale distrust of institutions from their repeated failures is a big barrier to this. In the West it appears the US is going to have the first crack at doing this system and I think one of the reasons Musk and his gang have stepped into politics is because the growing distrust level was so dangerous that implementing a system like this would be impossible. Now the cynic with a shiny hat says that we’re seeing decaying institutions everywhere in the West all at once, something that seems very odd. So is this just a case of creating a problem to provide a solution? We know that works as a method of inducing behaviour change, but it really doesn’t matter too much, it’s coming regardless of the reasons. So to look at the US, Musk and the Tech Billionaires come in and audit the US system and then fix it with the technocratic system we’re talking about. Provided they can get results that make the man on the streets life better, I think they will get buy in - after A LOT of screeching from opponents to it. I think this is true because I’ve come to realise that the average person doesn’t not care about the vast majority of anything outside of their immediate circle and geography. One of the most subversive things that’s been pushed increasingly over the past 20-30 years is the idea that you must have awareness, opinion and emotional responses to problems that are nothing to do with you. Somehow as a person living in a small Northern town in the UK you’re meant to care more about Israel and Palestine than whether the council is emptying the bins - and your councillors also prefer this obviously. Installing this way of thinking in the populace was essential to enable the globalists vision - the world is your problem and you need to know about it by the way, because we’re going to be bringing in those from far away lands and they’re going to live next door to you with all their problems that they refuse to let go of. Anyway, I digress. One of the uncomfortable things about reality is that it’s just that, uncomfortable. What if you’re the problem? Imagine that once implemented we find that some sections of society massively underperform, or have behavior that results in a net drain on society or are overrepresented in areas that cause damage to the society as a whole, what do you do about that? Remember in a transparent system this would all become common knowledge and you’d have to respond to it socially. Let’s imagine that it’s proven that veganism is actually the most healthy way for those without specific health issues that preclude it, to live. The state would want to try and implement that at scale - I personally and especially if I hadn’t ‘bought in’ to trusting the system, wouldn’t want to do that. Or what if it was found that at scale there was a genetic ceiling to the ability of white men to function successfully in modern society and that would not only put increased focus on my behaviour, but perhaps prevent me from occupying certain job roles? I’d really dislike that too, so much so it might be hard for me to accept it. But that’s the level of analysis and societal impact this kind of system makes possible and you can see that it has potential to completely undo much of how you’ve navigated life to this point. It’s at odds with the version of equality we’ve been sold by the left because the data will show us that all humans are not the same interchangeable chess pieces, some of us are dross and some of us are exceptional. It’s also at odds with some of the personal freedoms we’ve been sold by the right. If data proves a specific practice is optimal for you, but you don’t want to do it, who is the state to force you? In your case it may be that you want to continue eating meat, but for another it’s that they want to continue dressing a specific way - both are no longer known to be optimal, so it’s provable personal and societal sabotage to keep doing so, so why do it? I think when it comes down to it almost everyone will have their life altered and whether you get societal buy in will be about results - which luckily will be provable. The system is a tool that can be wielded differently depending on the result you want and the vision you’re trying to sell, and those with their hands on the levers of power will matter. You will never find perfection here, but humans always find a way to eventually remove those aren’t performing in the masses best interests. The Blair/WEF/Globalist vision is decelerative, it’s the eat the bugs version. Everyone brought to the same level, regardless of how low that is and regardless of how restricted your individual life has to be to ensure that there is the same outcome for all - globally, not nationally. You know my view on this, it is fundamentally anti human and therefore anti nature. You use the data to emphasise unfairness, sow division and jealousy, enable weakness, constrain the capable to the level of the incapable. It is slow death. The Musk version is accelerationist, the we’re going to Mars version. You accept that reality is unfair and lean into technological fixes for that. The impact of low IQ for example is remedied with personal AI helpers, disabilities are alleviated with cybernetics, just a couple of examples to show the mindset. You allow and encourage excellence in all things and you create a culture of optimism through positive action. You use the data to show best practice, accepting that different parts of society may have different best practice. Share the data, prove the concept, get the buy in from results instead of enforcement and you bring everyone forwards instead of dragging everyone backwards. It’s what humans have always done and not everyone makes it, that’s reality, but embracing our technology means that more people make it that ever before. This is my preferred version because I think it’s more aligned with reality as I see it, you may differ obviously.
There are lines that if crossed can radicalise even the normiest of normies. This is one of them and I hope they try to implement it. We came close when they dropped having to kill pets into the conversation during Covid and got the appropriate response. You have to note these seemingly throwaway articles when they appear, because they are sentiment gauges designed to nudge what’s acceptable and note how successful that’s been.
Here you morons I think you’re stupid enough to be appeased by us arresting a rubber dingy salesman. These people hate you and they’re laughing at you.
This is the de facto leader of Reform, Farage and Tice are liabilities in leadership roles, this is going to become more obvious over time.
It is in the interests of everyone - particularly the police, if they stop this. My understanding - gum shield ready Jim - is that there has already been advice to do so, so I do not understand why it’s still happening. I’d be amazed if those officers dealing with NCHI are happy doing so and should perhaps do more to make this understood. The police are going to lose the public in the UK at a time when they will need them the most, not the other way around. Cultural issues are going to spill over, there will be violence, and the when the police want the public to help or to empathise with the difficulties of their job, the public will laugh in their faces. I hate that this is true, but the public will not be treated in this way and cannot do anything to stop it, only the police can.
The weekend is here 🚀