Good Morning, I hope you’ve got a good dump ready to deploy, so sit back and enjoy your scroll as you visualise all the negativity accumulated over the previous 24hrs leave your body, ready for a new nightmare.
Really nice response to this yesterday and some decent feedback, so I’ll continue. I’ll just reiterate that this isn’t meant to be some int brief, it’s just stuff that I noticed that day and what I think about it that you can read on the toilet.
We’ll start with a few bits from the Dark Lord who was speaking yesterday at the Future Of Britain conference. He’s loving life at the moment because now Starmer is running the country, Tony gets to offer valuable ‘advice’. Now that we’ve seen the puppeteering concept proven with Obama’s third term dream 👈🏻 realised in the US, Tony fancies a crack at it. It’s worth noting that his Tony Blair Institute (I enjoy that the acronym is TBI) has more employees advising more people globally than UK Gov, working with many familiar faces from across the UK political spectrum including William Hague, Patrick Vallance, Gen. Nick Carter. Vallance is actually now Science Minister in Starmer’s Government, so we have direct crossover. It’s going to be interesting to see how this all plays out and how much of Blairs’ advice gets actioned.
The problem he has is the Labour Party. Tony was only nominally a Labour PM, he’s not even really left wing, hence the ‘Blue Labour’ - New Labour dig, he’s a Globalist Technocrat. So there’s every chance that when he pulls Starmer’s strings over policy, the left of the Labour Party - who are no fan of Mr Blair - will have none of it and attempt to go their own way. We’ve just seen this with his first attempt to get his pet project of Digital ID through, the Party said no. The question is how many times the Dark Lord will accept being told no before he pulls a Lizz Truss and get’s a new host with a more willing globalist ear.
Connected to the above and what I wrote yesterday is this Blair quote about Digital ID. Firstly notice that it’s phrased in textbook Blair style, ‘yes there is X issue, but because of X you can disregard that, the decision is already made and we need to get on with actioning it’. Once you see that in his speech you can’t un-see it, it’s what he’s always done and it’s very effective. Second, notice “but the important thing is not to see it as a control mechanism for government” - He means YOU shouldn’t see that.
One of the best bits of the debate is when it breaks down and they start arguing over who is better at golf! It amuses me greatly that Trump is now using this to campaign with. I think many in the US have now come to terms with the fact that Trump will win, I don’t feel quite the sense of threat against him. That may be because the Democrats think they’ll be able to force Biden out and swap for some one else, but that means Kamala for the short term at least, which is mental. It does give them their first ‘female woman of colour’ President though, and they may be stupid enough to find that irresistible.
Whilst we’re on the subject of the people responsible, spot who’s actually doing any work 👀
You’d hope this is too mental to happen, but that fact that people even think it’s a practical idea when they’re hoping to be in power should just shows how unserious politics is in the modern day. Even if you genuinely believe that this is a good and fair policy, your experience of human nature beyond sixth form politics should tell you that it’s practically impossible, UNLESS you’re thinking of doing something to prevent or deter people from leaving. But even then people on that level of income have the resources to keep what they’ve earned. As always in these situations, the rich leave, the Government can’t raise enough money and so they hit the middle classes. It’s always really about the middle classes as they’re where any real upwardly mobile resistance to power come from.
The vast majority of the world is still on a pre internet software update. The internet has repriced the world IF you are able to work remotely in some capacity. Balaji calls it ‘longitudinal arbitrage’. A couple of excellent sources if you’re looking to understand the world today are Balaji’s book ‘The Network State’ and the classic ‘The Sovereign Individual’ written in part by Jacob Rees-Moggs’ dad! You may not go for all of it, but having read them puts you in front of the majority of people awareness and preparedness wise.
LINK TO PO
More than any other religion Islam (Judaism comes close, but is slightly different) is a political movement. The left in the UK courted their vote because they have large families with many dependants who are hard to support through work alone. They’ve been like a drug to Labour, provided you promise to help support their families they will vote for you, Labour have been hooked (obviously the Tories did nothing about this either). However, we’re starting to see localised success by independant or skin-suited Green Party Muslim candidates in areas with large muslim populations. Labour have failed to realise (perhaps are beginning too) that once there is enough weight of numbers for these independant Muslim candidates to win, they will drop Labour. The Israel/Palestine situation has only sped up this process. Unfortunately it’s also normalised the idea that foreign conflict and sectarian issues that we could ignore, are now a reason to change your vote. Many of those candidates ran specifically on holding the UK Government to account over Palestine. It won’t be long until there is a party specifically (though likely not named as such) for advancing the interests of Muslims in the UK. They’re perfectly able to do this and why shouldn’t they? Though I’m not sure it’s desirable for the current majority of the UK, it’s perfectly reasonable for them to fight politically for things they believe are right and as a group they’re completely unashamed in doing so. THAT is where the issue is, because non Muslims absolutely ARE ashamed and shamed for standing up for their own interests. See ‘Islamaphobia’ and yesterdays anarcho-tyranny definition.
Just one reference yesterdays bit about prisons. I had a message of someone with knowledge of the situation - WE ARE EVERYWHERE 😅 -, turns out the prisoner release scheme is actually leftover Tory policy due to -predictably- not enough space in prisons. Labour have just got the bad optics of it and to be fair was potentially left as a landmine by the outgoing Government, if you believe they’re that competent. If this is true about the grooming gangs guy, perhaps that possibility has weight.
That’ll do today. Thanks again for reading, feel free to share to anyone you think may be interested, it also spreads the word generally about SEG and the ethos. Please drop a comment and leave some feedback, I’m interested in all opinion bar Hughs’. Particularly about length, some shits are longer than others so it’s difficult to gauge I know, but give me a steer.
Have a good one.