Morning, let’s see what’s been going on.
Ok, let’s start with this, you will have to bear with me. It turns out that Starmer has had a super injunction put in place so that the facts about his private life cannot come out. Now obviously this is a pretty large misstep by him as it’s an example of the Streisand effect, it will do nothing to stop the daily intrigue in the press and will only slow the inevitability of his departure, as he’s now a liability to Labour. We’ve been trying to work out who it is that decided he has to go and is enabling the pushing. Let’s take as sensible fact that there are ideological groups with similar power who have differing ideas about the direction the world should be going in, or at least where its current focus should be. These may be nations with a lot of influence, or groups within nations internationally who are aligned. Though not in this case, a historical example would be capitalists and communists. Neither are nations, but they are ideologies that cross borders to influence and drive disparate groups aiming to enable their vision of the future. We can accept that’s true and not conspiracy theory I’m sure. These people are not in a evil conspiracy WhatsApp group together, they don’t need to be, they know what end result they want and whether influential civilian or politician acting within a government, they act independently towards the same end, there’s no instructions. To labour the point, think D-Day. Paratroopers dropped all over the place, command and control nonexistent, but everyone knows the end result they want and works towards it in individual ways to influence the outcome.
The groups in this case seem to Techno-Globalist and Zionist. Note that I’m not saying these groups are always on different sides or that there aren’t parties who benefit from either of them, or even that individuals are fixed in the support of either. The current issue is where international priorities should be, Ukraine, or Israel and the wider Middle East and it should be obvious who wants what.
Up until the last couple of days my opinion was that the pressure on Starmer had started to be applied when he ignored some of Tony Blair’s advice and moved in a different direction. Although Blair would generally be someone you’d describe as a Techno-Globalist, ie. he believes in a technology driven, elite managerial world where power is centralised supra-nationally in organisations like the UN, WHO etc and nation states and their peoples are subservient to that - I felt he was acting mainly in a purely selfish manner by pulling strings to remove him, because Starmer had obviously given assurances he’d take Blair’s ‘advice’ once in office and then ignored him. We should remember that Blair is one of those savvy enough to move between camps though.
What began to change my mind was Starmers speech in the UN, where he criticised both sides of the Israeli/ Palestine conflict and called for them both to ceasefire. He then confirmed the UK’s unending support for the war in Ukraine. That was when the flair went up to interested parties that it was time to start insinuating that Starmer was gay, which has now built over days to people overtly talking about it and his previous affair. Once you know where people’s allegiances and interests are then you can read it like a book. At the high mainstream level you have (generally) the right leaning publications and talking heads pushing the gay stuff (zionist aligned) and the same on the left trying to brush off and down play it down (Techno-Globalist aligned). Then at the low mainstream and slop level you people like Katie Hopkins and the boy Robinson, both affirmed Zionists, making videos and posting online to their followers driving the gay/affair story. With similar in reverse on the left playing it down. Obviously some of this is just people playing left and right, defending their sides and unaware of anything wider than that, but when everyone moves in one direction immediately using the same phrases and talking points, you know it’s not organic. It was this post above by Robinson and one that followed it, all but naming the subject of the original affair, that finally confirmed to me that this wasn’t Blair punishing Starmer, but those who want to get out of Ukraine and focus the West’s attention and resources on Israel and the wider Middle East. Breaking a super injunction isn’t inconsequential, you’re getting arrested and fined heavily at the least. Please remember that Tommy Robinson is just a man. He may have a decent net worth of a million plus, but when you are constantly being arrested, going to court, being fined and imprisoned, even that kind of money runs dry pretty quick. That he’s so happy to put himself back in the legal firing line spontaneously over what is effectively just gossip, not his existential fight between the UK and Muslims that he’s usually involved in, should raise an eyebrow. You’d need to know your pockets would get deeper should you need them to, before going all in on something like this. But of course he has a history of spontaneously popping up, being unbanned on socials and driving particular causes, before being arrested like the freedom fighter he is, only to somehow end up back sunning himself in Spain. Funny that.
It reminds me of, but is not totally linked to an old concept called Hyperreality, a political evolution of which was used in Russia in the 90’s to help control the populace. I’m not going to go into it now at length, but in simple terms the idea was to create a situation where the public never had any real idea of what was truth, who was genuine, and therefore the possibility to build any effective challenge to Putin and his government was almost impossible. Cultural and political movements on all sides of all arguments were enabled by the regime and captured genuine people on all sides who fell for it unknowingly. The end result being that mainstream reality became a play put on by the regime, to confuse and distract people, whilst they wielded power in their wider interests. You no doubt won’t be surprised at this point that this concept worked so well, it was duly implemented by the West. I’ll leave you to have a think about some obvious examples of this, today we call the practice ‘astroturfing.’