The Scroll

31/7/24

Morning, I don’t think we’re going to get away from Southport, so let’s take a look at last night.

Predictably and frustratingly there was a riot last night in Southport. There is understandable anger among that community, as there is in the country at large for obvious reasons. Sadly as these things often do, that anger boiled over into violence that in this case was directed at the only representatives of the Government present at that time - seen as being those to blame for the attack happening - the Police. I’m sure the Police in attendance understood completely that this was going to happen and despite it being likely that some of those taking the hit were involved in the action to stop the attack and save the injured the day before, just took it, as that’s the job.

All day yesterday the media were effectively doing advertisement for this, speaking about ‘fears of a far right protest’. If you were the kind of turd that just fancied a scrap - if if you’ve ever been in a riot and I have, it can be A LOT of fun - then you knew it was happening. Do I think the people involved are ‘far right’, no I don’t. I think it’s correct to be extremely angry about the attack and it’s wider connections to Government policy. There will of course be complete sub 80 IQ scum in that crowd who will no doubt be the loudest and most proactively violent. The fact that a mosque was involved as a flashpoint tells you there’s no one there thinking about anything wider than smash things. As it stands there’s be no connection found to Islam in the attack, so by doing the predicable thing the rioters fall into a trap. It’s worth noting that there was also a peaceful vigil in Southport town centre where a man on his way there was stopped with a knife, I don’t know the complete timeline, but if that happened prior to the riot and knowledge of it spread, looking at the guy you can perhaps see why the mosque ended up involved. I’ll just reiterate that sometimes I think the X accounts I take posts from are mongs, but they’re useful for illustration.

The problem with all of this is that it’s exactly what the Government want as the response. You’ll now see the actual attack, the individual responsible and all valid issues that contributed to it wither away in the media and as a result, in the public consciousness. The reframing of the attack as a ‘knife crime’ issue, happened almost immediately, with the Home Secretary and Prime Minister setting that approved narrative.

This wasn’t knife crime. The knife didn’t jump up and butcher children. An individual took a means he had available to him and carried out an action. He chose the action, the tool is incidental. This reframing should be called out repeatedly whenever they use it, do not accept it. If we’ve learnt anything from the past 10 years it should be the power of words and how their use can bend reality. Allowing those responsible - and Government policy is partially responsible for this - to set the standards for the conversation skews things in their favour.

But sadly because the standard useful idiots did exactly that in effect by becoming violent and attacking exactly what people expect them to attack - as we’ve said in this case probably unjustifiably - they allow further reframing of the problem as far right. If there really was a far right in the UK effective enough to be an issue then you’d perhaps give the Government the benefit of the doubt on this, but there isn’t. I’m not saying they don’t exist, I’m saying they’re not effective enough to be an issue. What we’ve seen labelled as far right by the Government, media and establishment rent-an-opinion voices is people with valid concerns about a policy they didn’t vote for, and in fact as a majority actively voted against, that they’re having pushed on them that they believe is responsible for change in society that is detrimental to them and harmful to those they love.

Involuntary demographic shift in a country is one of the most challenging crises that it can face. In the past when people from outside your lands entered in en masse and you didn’t want them to, you could take steps to stop that, even at a local level. This is how cultures and peoples evolved over time, by the selective intaking and repulsing of those who differed from them. We now see this involuntary shift everywhere in the West and make no mistake, it is deliberate, along with the manufactured panic about the far right. Unlike a tyrannical government, which presents a clear and justifiable conflict, this situation pits individuals against each other without their consent. This is especially tragic because it becomes difficult to distinguish between those causing problems due to unaligned cultures or backgrounds and many who are not contributing to any issues. As a result, people become resentful of one another. Without any changes, the situation will inevitably lead to a breaking point. The most dangerous thing about that is those to blame, the Government, will not be in the firing line for that rage, it will be you, your friends and neighbours, along with genuinely good people trying to do their best to integrate and live a good life.

I’ll finish up on this by just talking about something that seems obvious to me, but you may disagree with. We spoke about it on the latest Horizon Scan that unfortunately didn’t go out due to connection issues, it was unlistenable. We’ll talk about the UK, but you’ll see this all over the West if you look. It’s my view that mass immigration and demographic replacement - on a long enough timeline - is UK Government policy, this I think is relatively recent, as in the last 30 years or so. I’ve only come to terms with this in the past 3-4 years myself. Where they are aware - and they see only the effects of it in their daily lives and it can be hard to put 2 & 2 together when that’s the last thing you want to do - the current UK population are not in favour of this and so must be managed. Any pushback will generally come from the right and so it is necessary to provide a method of containment to catch that push back in. It’s my view that much of what you see in the way of the ‘far right’ in the UK isn’t genuine in it’s inception and organisation. We specifically spoke on Horizon Scan about Tommy Robinson. To me he doesn’t pass the smell test. I believe he and those prominent faces like him serve as a magnet to attract people who may in other circumstances be an effective push back against UKGOV policy - You are allowed to not like UKGOV policy and make a public case against it. I make no other comment about him and things he’s done other than I believe he is presented as a leader of a movement who is being constantly persecuted by the establishment and as a result people with beliefs he espouses gravitate towards him. He has an uncanny habit of appearing just when public sentiment is rising against the effects UKGOV policy and either invalidating genuine concerns through violence (not him personally necessarily, but those he attracts) or by serving as a beacon that gathers new influential voices on right to him in order to refresh the list of faces of interest to the Security Services. If I was the Security Services and it was my job to ensure UKGOV policy is able to be enacted without danger and disruption, that’s exactly the system I would use, seems obvious. You can of course argue that this is exactly what they should be doing, I don’t dispute they’re doing their job, but in this case it becomes difficult, because the policy being defended is not the will of the people, so they are helping to enforce harm, not health.

The point I make is that if there’s ever going to be an effective push back against these policies it must be far more professional, disciplined, realistic and sensible than it currently is. It will have to distance itself from the like of Robinson and be wary of infiltration by those similar to him.

Another thing Hugh and I spoke about on the non broadcast HS, was that I think that due to ‘controlled spontaneity’ - the Governments policy of winding down dissent and diverting attention from the causes after similar attacks - the Southport attacker will be out of the news within a week, replaced by something else in the news cycle, Hugh disagreed. Anyone in the public eye with influence talking about the Soldier who was attacked last week? Nope. I hope this doesn’t happen in this case. I know I personally in my own small way will be re-upping it on X repeatedly, with the focus on the attack and not reaction to it. Sorry to blackpill but this kind of thing is going to keep happening until UKGOV policy on multiculturalism and immigration is revised and those normal people who stepped forward into harms way to protect those children and those like them - you would hope OUR community - will have to keep doing so.

You must be ready.

Anyway, that’ll do I reckon. Have a nice Wednesday.